|
Quotes & Info
|
| CWT > SEC Filings for CWT > Form 10-Q on 9-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
9-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
• changes in regulatory commissions' policies and procedures;
• the timeliness of regulatory commissions' actions concerning rate relief;
• changes in the capital markets and access to sufficient capital on satisfactory terms;
• new legislation;
• changes in accounting valuations and estimates;
• changes in accounting treatment for regulated companies, including adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, if required;
• electric power interruptions;
• increases in suppliers' prices and the availability of supplies including water and power;
• fluctuations in interest rates;
• changes in environmental compliance and water quality requirements;
• acquisitions and the ability to successfully integrate acquired companies;
• the ability to successfully implement business plans;
• civil disturbances or terrorist threats or acts, or apprehension about the possible future occurrences of acts of this type;
• the involvement of the United States in war or other hostilities;
• our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;
• labor relations matters as we negotiate with the unions;
• implementation of new information technology systems;
• restrictive covenants in or changes to the credit ratings on current or future debt that could increase financing costs or affect the ability to borrow, make payments on debt, or pay dividends;
• general economic conditions, including changes in customer growth patterns and our ability to collect billed revenue from customers;
• changes in customer water use patterns and the effects of conservation;
• the impact of weather on water sales and operating results;
• the ability to satisfy requirements related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulations on internal controls; and
• the risks set forth in "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this quarterly report.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, investors are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as
of the date of this quarterly report or as of the date of any document
incorporated by reference in this report, as applicable. When considering
forward-looking statements, investors should keep in mind the cautionary
statements in this quarterly report and the documents incorporated by reference.
We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to
update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We maintain our accounting records in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and as directed by the
regulatory commissions to which we are subject. The process of preparing
financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates and
assumptions on the part of management. The estimates and assumptions used by
management are based on historical experience and our understanding of current
facts and circumstances. Management believes that the following accounting
policies are critical because they involve a higher degree of complexity and
judgment, and can have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial condition. These policies and their key characteristics are discussed
in detail in the 2008 Form 10-K. They include:
• revenue recognition and the water revenue adjustment mechanism;
• expense balancing and memorandum accounts;
• modified cost balancing accounts;
• regulatory utility accounting;
• income taxes;
• pension benefits;
• workers' compensation, general liability and other claims; and
• contingencies
For the period ended September 30, 2009, there were no changes in the methodology for computing critical accounting estimates, no additional accounting estimates met the standards for critical accounting policies, and there were no material changes to the important assumptions underlying the critical accounting estimates.
Rate increases $ 12,544 Usage by new customers 3,258 Net change due to actual versus adopted results, usage, and other (8,338 ) Net operating revenue increase $ 7,464 |
The net change due to actual versus adopted results, usage, and other in the above table refers to the revenue impact year over year of the change in revenue recognized by the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism (WRAM) and Modified Cost Balancing Account (MCBA). The WRAM is impacted by changes in consumption patterns from our historical trends as well as an increase in conservation efforts. The MCBA, which records the differences in production costs from the adopted costs, is recorded as an element of revenue as it represents pass through costs which are billed to customers. The MCBA is impacted by changes in total production quantities, the production mix of the source of water, the price paid for purchased water and power, and the amount of pump taxes paid. The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
Purchased water offset increases $ 5,844
Step-rate increases 2,878
General Rate Case (GRC) increases 2,726
Balancing account adjustments 271
Other 825
Total rate increases $ 12,544
|
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $115.1 million for the third quarter of 2009,
versus $104.9 million for the same period in 2008, a 10% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power, and pump
taxes. It represents the largest component of total operating expenses,
accounting for approximately 43% of total operating expenses in the third
quarter of 2009. Water production expenses increased 5% compared to the same
period last year due to increased cost of purchased water and purchased power,
although usage was down. Our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Washington
Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water obtain all of their water supply from
wells.
Sources of water as a percent of total water production are listed in the following table:
Three Months Ended September 30
2009 2008
Well production 51 % 51 %
Purchased 46 % 45 %
Surface 3 % 4 %
Total 100 % 100 %
|
The components of water production costs are shown in the table below:
Three Months Ended September 30
2009 2008 Change
Purchased water $ 35,326 $ 33,858 $ 1,468
Purchased power 10,089 9,285 804
Pump taxes 3,483 3,312 171
Total $ 48,898 $ 46,455 $ 2,443
|
Purchased water costs increased due to price increases from water wholesalers.
Total water production, measured in acre feet, decreased by 7% during the third
quarter of 2009 as compared with the third quarter of 2008, due to lower
customer usage primarily attributed to cooler weather and voluntary
conservation.
Administrative and general expense and other operations expense increased 21% to
$33.7 million. The primary increase was due to increased pension costs, other
employee benefit costs, increased payroll expense from new employees, and
increased legal expenses. On January 1, 2009, wage increases became effective
and there was an increase in the number of employees. At September 30, 2009,
there were 976 employees and at September 30, 2008, there were 936 employees.
Maintenance expenses increased by 15% to $4.4 million in the third quarter of
2009 compared to $3.8 million in the third quarter of 2008, due to an increase
in main and service repairs. Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$1.0 million, or 11%, because of 2008 capital additions.
Federal and state income taxes charged to operating expenses and other income
and expenses increased $0.9 million, from a provision of $13.2 million in the
third quarter of 2008 to $14.1 million in the third quarter of 2009, due to a
change in the effective tax rate recognized in the third quarter due to revised
estimated permanent differences. We expect the effective tax rate to be between
40% and 40.7% for fiscal year 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Non-regulated revenue, net of related expenses, reflected net income of
$1.0 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to a loss of $0.4 million in
the same period last year, which is an increase of $1.4 million. The change from
the prior year is due to a favorable change of the cash surrender value of the
life insurance contracts associated with certain benefit plans.
Interest Expense
Total interest expense, net of interest capitalized, increased $1.4 million to
$5.5 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period last
year. This increase was attributable to the additional interest on the First
Mortgage Bonds issued in April 2009.
Rate increases $ 43,330 Increase in usage by new customers 9,076 Net change due to actual verses adopted results, usage, and other (20,163 ) Net changes in operating revenue $ 32,243 |
The net change due to actual versus adopted results, usage, and other in the
above table refers to the revenue impact year over year of the change in revenue
recognized by the WRAM and MCBA. The WRAM is impacted by changes in consumption
patterns from our historical trends as well as an increase in conservation
efforts. The MCBA, which records the differences in production costs from the
adopted costs, is recorded as an element of revenue as it is a pass through
cost. The MCBA is impacted by changes in total production quantities, the
production mix of the source of water, the price paid for purchased water and
power, and the amount of pump taxes paid.
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
General Rate Case (GRC) increase $ 25,841
Purchased water offset increase 12,300
Step rate increase 3,677
Balancing account adjustments 687
Other 825
Total rate increases $ 43,330
|
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $296.1 million for the nine-months ended
September 30, 2009, versus $264.1 million for the same period in 2008, a 12%
increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power and pump
taxes. Water production expense represents the largest component of total
operating expenses, accounting for approximately 40% of total operating
expenses. Water production expenses increased $7.3 million in the nine-months
ended September 30, 2009, or 7%, compared to the same period last year due to
increased cost of purchased water and purchased power. Our wholly-owned
operating subsidiaries, Washington Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water,
obtain all of their water supply from wells.
Sources of water production as a percent of total water production are listed on the following table:
Nine-months ended September 30
2009 2008
Well production 49 % 49 %
Purchased 48 % 47 %
Surface 3 % 4 %
Total 100 % 100 %
|
The components of water production costs are shown in the table below:
Nine-months ended September 30
2009 2008 Change
Purchased water $ 89,920 $ 85,354 $ 4,566
Purchased power 22,216 19,704 2,512
Pump taxes 7,332 7,104 228
Total $ 119,468 $ 112,162 $ 7,306
|
Purchased water cost increased due to higher prices from wholesalers. Included
in purchased water are leases of unused water rights of $1.8 million and
$1.6 million during the nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008, respectively. The increase in purchased power is primarily due to the
acquisitions in Hawaii last year.
Administration and general and other operations expenses were $98.8 million,
increasing $18.7 million, or 23%, for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009.
The increase was primarily due to increased pension and postretirement benefit
costs, other benefit costs, new employees, and outside legal services. Payroll
charged to operating expense increased $1.6 million for the nine-months ended
September 30, 2009. Wages for union employees increased 3.0%, effective January
1, 2009. Overall payroll costs (expensed and capitalized) increased 6.7% for the
nine-months ended September 30, 2009, due to increases in the number of
employees and higher wage rates. At September 30, 2009, there were 976 employees
and at September 30, 2008, there were 936 employees.
Maintenance expense increased for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009,
increasing $0.5 million, or 4%, due to an increase in main and service repairs.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.0 million, or 11%, because of
increased capital expenditures in 2008.
Federal and state income taxes increased $1.3 million, or 7%, for the
nine-months ended September 30, 2009, due to a change in the effective tax rate
due to revised estimated permanent differences and change in taxable income. We
expect the effective tax rate to be between 40% and 40.7% for 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Other income, net of related expenses, was $3.0 million for the nine-months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to a loss of $0.1 million for the first
nine-months of 2008. The change from the prior year is due to an increase in
non-utility service revenues and a gain on the sale of non-utility property. In
addition, other expense was reduced by a gain in cash surrender value of life
insurance contracts associated with our benefit plans of $3.6 million in the
nine-months ended September 30, 2009. In the prior year, we recorded a loss
(reduction) in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts associated with
our benefit plans of $2.2 million for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2008. The cash surrender value is determined in part by the market of certain
underlining funds, the value of which reflects changes in the stock market. Due
to a significant increase in the stock market in the first nine months of 2009,
there was a corresponding increase to the cash surrender value of the life
insurance contracts.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense increased $1.8 million to $15.2 million for the period
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the nine-month period ended September 30,
2008. This increase was attributable to the additional interest on the First
Mortgage Bonds issued in April 2009 less increased capitalized interest on
construction activity.
REGULATORY MATTERS
Rates and Regulations
The state regulatory commissions have plenary powers setting rates and operating
standards. As such, state commission decisions significantly impact our
revenues, earnings, and cash flows. The amounts discussed herein are generally
annual amounts, unless specifically stated, and the financial impact to recorded
revenue is expected to occur over a 12-month period from the effective date of
the decision. In California, water utilities are required to make several
different types of filings. Most filings result in rate changes that remain in
place until the next General Rate Case (GRC). As explained below, surcharges and
surcredits to recover balancing and memorandum accounts as well as interim rate
true-ups are temporary rate changes, which have specific time frames for
recovery.
GRCs, step rate increase filings, and offset filings change rates to amounts
that will remain in effect until the next GRC. The CPUC follows a rate case
plan, which requires Cal Water to file a GRC for each of its 24 regulated
operating districts every three years. In a GRC proceeding, the CPUC not only
considers the utility's rate setting requests, but may also consider other
issues that affect the utility's rates and operations. Effective in 2004, Cal
Water's GRC schedule was shifted from a calendar year to a fiscal year with test
years commencing on July 1st of each year. The CPUC is generally required to
issue its GRC decision prior to the first day of the test year or authorize
interim rates. As such, Cal Water's GRC decisions, prior to 2005, were generally
issued in the fourth quarter. Effective with the 2009 GRC, the processing time
is scheduled for eighteen months with rates effective on January 1, 2011.
Between GRC filings utilities may file escalation rate increases, which allow
the utility to recover cost increases, primarily from inflation and incremental
investment, during the second and third years of the rate case cycle. However,
escalation rate increases are subject to a weather-normalized earnings test.
Under the earnings test, the CPUC may reduce the escalation rate increase to
prevent the utility from earning in excess of the authorized rate of return for
that district.
In addition, utilities are entitled to file offset filings. Offset filings may
be filed to adjust revenues for construction projects authorized in GRCs when
the plant is placed in service or for rate changes charged to the Company for
purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes (referred to as "offsettable
expenses"). Such rate changes approved in offset filings remain in effect until
a GRC is approved. Additional information on the Company's regulatory process is
described in its annual report on Form 10-K dated March 2, 2009.
Remaining Unrecorded Balances from Previously Authorized Balancing Accounts
Recoveries/Refunds
The total of unrecorded, under-collected memorandum and balancing accounts was
approximately $1.1 million as of September 30, 2009.
2009 Regulatory Activity to Date
Cost of Capital Application
On May 1, 2008, Cal Water filed an application in compliance with the Rate Case
Plan to establish an allowable cost of capital for 2009, 2010, and 2011. The
cost of capital evaluation includes such issues as the authorized return on
equity, the cost of debt, and the equitable capital structure for Cal Water.
This application, A.08-05-002, was considered along with similar applications
from two other multi-district California water utilities. On May 7, 2009, the
CPUC issued D.09-05-019 ruling on these issues and adopting a cost of capital
for Cal Water for 2009. The CPUC authorized Cal Water a 10.20% return on equity,
the same provision as had been last adopted by the CPUC for Cal Water in 2007
and 2008. The decision also allowed a capital structure of 53% equity and 47%
debt. Finally, the decision also allowed a temporary interest rate balancing
account to insulate the utilities and their ratepayers from volatile debt
financing costs due to market uncertainty. The total effect of the decision was
a rate decrease, of $1.8 million in annual revenues effective in June 2009.
On July 30, 2009, the CPUC issued its D.09-07-051, which adopted an all-party
settlement for a cost of capital adjustment mechanism. Under the settlement, the
authorized return on equity may be adjusted prospectively based on annual
changes in a bond index. The mechanism has a threshold trigger of 100 basis
points change in the index before any adjustment is made to Cal Water's
authorized return. Cal Water does not anticipate the mechanism will trigger in
2009.
2009 California General Rate Case Filing
On July 2, 2009, Cal Water filed its required application for a general review
of rates for all operating districts and general operations. The application,
A.09-07-001, requests an annual increase in rates of $70.6 million on January 1,
2011, $24.8 million on January 1, 2012, and $24.8 million on January 1, 2013.
The filing marks the beginning of an eighteen month review process. As a result,
and based on past experience, Cal Water cannot predict at this time the ultimate
rate change the Commission will order. The Commission is generally required
under state law to allow Cal Water interim rates and an effective date of
January 1, 2011 if a decision is not rendered in the proceeding by that date.
Request for MTBE regulatory treatment
On July 10, 2009, Cal Water filed an application requesting the CPUC adopt
ratemaking treatment of proceeds from its partial settlement of MTBE
contamination litigation. Cal Water has requested that all of the proceeds be
reinvested in infrastructure to treat or replace MTBE-contaminated facilities.
In addition, Cal Water has requested that 50% of the reinvestment be included in
rate base upon which Cal Water could earn its authorized fair and reasonable
rate of return. The remaining 50% of the settlement proceeds would be included
in rate base as contributions in aid of construction which does not earn a
return. Cal Water has also requested specific regulatory treatment of future
settlement or litigation proceeds that may occur in the consolidated MTBE cases.
The CPUC has also opened a "rulemaking" proceeding, R.09-03-014, to consider,
among other things, whether it should adopt a standard policy for ratemaking
treatment of litigation proceeds. This rulemaking is scheduled to be concluded
in the second quarter of 2010. The CPUC has previously authorized a wide range
of regulatory treatments of contamination litigation proceeds. Due to the open
. . .
|
|