|
Quotes & Info
|
| ACIW > SEC Filings for ACIW > Form 10-Q on 6-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
6-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations
that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Generally, forward-looking
statements do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and may include
words or phrases such as "believes," "will," "expects," "anticipates,"
"intends," and words and phrases of similar impact. The forward-looking
statements are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements in this report
include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future operations,
business strategy, business environment and key trends, as well as statements
related to expected financial and other benefits from our organizational
restructuring activities. Many of these factors will be important in determining
our actual future results. Any or all of the forward-looking statements in this
report may turn out to be incorrect. They may be based on inaccurate assumptions
or may not account for known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently,
no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future results may vary
materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements,
and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to
update any forward-looking statements after the date of this report, except as
required by law. All forward-looking statements contained in this report are
expressly qualified by the risk factors discussed in our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Such factors include, but are not limited
to, risks related to the global financial crisis, restrictions and other
financial covenants in our credit facility, volatility and disruption of the
capital and credit markets, our restructuring efforts, the restatement of our
financial statements, consolidation in the financial services industry, changes
in the financial services industry, the accuracy of backlog estimates, material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, our tax positions,
volatility in our stock price, risks from operating internationally, increased
competition, our offshore software development activities, the performance of
our strategic product, BASE24-eps, the maturity of certain legacy retail payment
products, our strategy to migrate customers to our next generation products,
ratable or deferred recognition of certain revenue associated with customer
migrations and the maturity of certain of our legacy retail payment products,
demand for our products, our alliance with IBM, our outsourcing agreement with
IBM, the complexity of our products and the risk that they may contain hidden
defects, governmental regulations and industry standards, our compliance with
privacy regulations, system failures, the protection of our intellectual
property, future acquisitions and investments and litigation. The cautionary
statements in this report expressly qualify all of our forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those
expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, those discussed in Item 1A in the section entitled "Risk Factors."
The following discussion should be read together with our financial statements
and related notes contained in this report and with the financial statements and
related notes and Management's Discussion & Analysis in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed March 4, 2009 and
our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and filed on August 7, 2009.
Results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.
Overview
We develop, market, install and support a broad line of software products and
services primarily focused on facilitating electronic payments. In addition to
our own products, we distribute, or act as a sales agent for, software developed
by third parties. Our products are sold and supported through distribution
networks covering three geographic regions - the Americas, EMEA and
Asia/Pacific. Each distribution network has its own sales force and supplements
its sales force with independent reseller and/or distributor networks. Our
products and services are used principally by financial institutions, retailers
and electronic payment processors, both in domestic and international markets.
Accordingly, our business and operating results are influenced by trends such as
information technology spending levels, the growth rate of the electronic
payments industry, mandated regulatory changes, and changes in the number and
type of customers in the financial services industry. Our products are marketed
under the ACI Worldwide brand.
We derive a majority of our revenues from non-domestic operations and believe
our greatest opportunities for growth exist largely in international markets.
Refining our global infrastructure is a critical component of driving our
growth. We have launched a globalization strategy which includes elements
intended to streamline our supply chain and provide low-cost centers of
expertise to support a growing international customer base. In fiscal 2006, we
established a new subsidiary in Ireland to serve as the focal point for certain
international product development and commercialization efforts. This subsidiary
oversees remote software development operations in Romania and India, as well as
manages certain of our intellectual property rights. During 2008 and 2009, we
have continued our efforts to take a direct selling and support strategy in
certain countries where historically we have used third-party distributors to
represent our products, in an effort to develop closer relationships with our
customers and develop a stronger overall position in those countries.
In 2009, we launched the Agile Payments Solution vision to deliver a unified
solution that initiates, manages, secures and operates payments to maximize the
total economic impact for our customers. In creating the vision, we have
identified a set of capabilities that are needed within that unified solution.
From the existing product set, we have identified a focus set of the products
which will deliver many of these capabilities. During the next year, we will
identify whether a build, buy or partner route is the most appropriate way to
deliver the other capabilities.
In March 2008, we announced to customers the timelines for maturing many of our
retail payment engines products. These products were developed or acquired by
ACI over several years and include BASE24, TRANS24-eft, ON/2, OpeN/2 and ASx.
Our strategy is to help customers migrate to our next-generation BASE24-eps
solution as we discontinue standard support for previous products. This will
allow customers to take advantage of our newest technology and allow us to more
efficiently focus our research and development investment. Towards the end of
2008, we announced to customers the time lines for maturing of many of the back
office service products. It is anticipated that some of these back office
services will be provided by products obtained through the acquisition of
certain intellectual property that we expect to close during the fourth quarter
2009.
As a result of the announced timelines for maturing certain of our retail
payment engines products, we may experience a temporary decline in GAAP revenue
recognition. As customers elect to renew, extend the term of, or add capacity or
functionality to certain of our maturing retail payment engines products, we
would expect a higher proportion of any up-front payments to be recognized
ratably over time rather than as a lump sum. As a result, we would expect a
temporary decline in our initial license fee ("ILF") revenue and a corresponding
increase in our monthly license fee ("MLF") revenue during this period. We would
also expect a corresponding increase to current deferred revenue.
Additionally, as customers undertake migration projects to our next-generation
BASE24-eps solution, we would expect a higher proportion of our revenue to be
deferred pending completion of the migration project. Depending on specific
circumstances, revenues subject to deferral may include license, capacity,
maintenance, and services fees. For those revenues subject to deferral, we would
expect a corresponding increase to deferred revenue.
We have launched, in North America, a service called ACI On Demand, wherein we
host our payment systems and sell them as a service to banks, retailers and
processors.
Key trends that currently impact our strategies and operations include:
• Global Financial Markets Uncertainty. The continuing uncertainty in the
global financial markets has negatively impacted general business
conditions. It is possible that a weakening economy could adversely affect
our customers, their purchasing plans, or even their solvency, but we
cannot predict whether or to what extent this will occur. We have
diversified counterparties and customers, but we continue to monitor our
counterparty and customer risks closely. While the effects of the economic
conditions in the future are not predictable, we believe our global
presence, the breadth and diversity of our service offerings and our
enhanced expense management capabilities position us well in a slower
economic climate. Market analysts, such as Boston Consulting Group,
indicate that banks now recognize the importance of payments to their
business, so providing services for that aspect of the business is of less
risk than for other aspects of their business.
• Availability of Credit. There have been significant disruptions in the capital and credit markets during the past year and many lenders and financial institutions have reduced or ceased to provide funding to borrowers. The availability of credit, confidence in the entire financial sector, and volatility in financial markets have been adversely affected. These disruptions are likely to have some impact on all institutions in the U.S. banking and financial industries, including our lenders and the lenders of our customers. The Federal Reserve Bank has been providing vast amounts of liquidity into the banking system to compensate for weaknesses in short-term borrowing markets and other capital markets. A reduction in the Federal Reserve's activities or capacity could reduce liquidity in the markets, thereby increasing funding costs or reducing the availability of funds to finance our existing operations as well as those of our customers. We are not currently dependent upon short-term funding, and the limited availability of credit in the market has not affected our revolving credit facility or our liquidity or materially impacted our funding costs.
• Increasing electronic payment transaction volumes. Electronic payment volumes continue to increase around the world, taking market share from traditional cash and check transactions. Boston Consulting Group 2009 report predicts that payments globally will grow at 8% per annum between 2008 and 2016, with varying growth rates based on the type of payment and part of the world. We leverage the growth in transaction volumes through the licensing of new systems to customers whose older systems cannot handle increased volume and through the licensing of capacity upgrades to existing customers.
• Increasing competition. The electronic payments market is highly competitive and subject to rapid change. Our competition comes from in-house information technology departments, third-party electronic payment processors and third-party software companies located both within and outside of the United States. Many of these companies are significantly larger than us and have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources. As electronic payment transaction volumes increase, third-party processors tend to provide competition to our solutions, particularly among customers that do not seek to differentiate their electronic payment offerings. As consolidation in the financial services industry continues, we anticipate that competition for those customers will intensify.
• Adoption of open systems technology. In an effort to leverage lower-cost computing technologies and current technology staffing and resources, many financial institutions, retailers and electronic payment processors are seeking to transition their systems from proprietary technologies to open technologies. Our continued investment in open systems technologies is, in part, designed to address this demand.
• Electronic payments fraud and compliance. As electronic payment transaction volumes increase, criminal elements continue to find ways to commit a growing volume of fraudulent transactions using a wide range of techniques. Financial institutions, retailers and electronic payment processors continue to seek ways to leverage new technologies to identify and prevent fraudulent transactions. Due to concerns with international terrorism and money laundering, financial institutions in particular are being faced with increasing scrutiny and regulatory pressures. We continue to see opportunity to offer our fraud detection solutions to help customers manage the growing levels of electronic payment fraud and compliance activity.
• Adoption of smartcard technology. In many markets, card issuers are being required to issue new cards with embedded chip technology. Chip-based cards are more secure, harder to copy and offer the opportunity for multiple functions on one card (e.g. debit, credit, electronic purse, identification, health records, etc.). The EMV standard for issuing and processing debit and credit card transactions has emerged as the global standard, with many regions throughout the world working on EMV rollouts. The primary benefit of EMV deployment is a reduction in electronic payment fraud, with the additional benefit that the core infrastructure necessary for multi-function chip cards is being put in place (e.g., chip card readers in ATM's and POS devices) allowing the deployment of other technologies like contactless. We are working with many customers around the world to facilitate EMV deployments, leveraging several of our solutions.
• Single Euro Payments Area ("SEPA"). The SEPA, primarily focused on the European Economic Community and the United Kingdom, is designed to facilitate lower costs for cross-border payments and reduce timeframes for settling electronic payment transactions. Our retail and wholesale banking solutions facilitate key functions that help financial institutions address these mandated regulations.
• Financial institution consolidation. Consolidation continues on a national and international basis, as financial institutions seek to add market share and increase overall efficiency. Such consolidations have increased, and may continue to increase, in their number, size and market impact as a result of the global economic crisis and the financial crisis affecting the banking and financial industries. There are several potential negative effects of increased consolidation activity. Continuing consolidation of financial institutions may result in a smaller number of existing and potential customers for our products and services. Consolidation of two of our customers could result in reduced revenues if the combined entity were to negotiate greater volume discounts or discontinue use of certain of our products. Additionally, if a non-customer and a customer combine and the combined entity in turn decides to forego future use of our products, our revenue would decline. Conversely, we could benefit from the combination of a non-customer and a customer when the combined entity continues use of our products and, as a larger combined entity, increases its demand for our products and services. We tend to focus on larger financial institutions as customers, often resulting in our solutions being the solutions that survive in the consolidated entity.
• Electronic payments convergence. As electronic payment volumes grow and pressures to lower overall cost per transaction increase, financial institutions are seeking methods to consolidate their payment processing across the enterprise. We believe that the strategy of using service-oriented-architectures to allow for re-use of common electronic payment functions such as authentication, authorization, routing and settlement will become more common. Using these techniques, financial institutions will be able to reduce costs, increase overall service levels, enable one-to-one marketing in multiple bank channels, leverage volumes for improved pricing and liquidity, and manage enterprise risk. Our product development strategy is, in part, focused on this trend, by creating integrated payment functions that can be re-used by multiple bank channels, across both the consumer and wholesale bank. While this trend presents an opportunity for us, it may also expand the competition from third-party electronic payment technology and service providers specializing in other forms of electronic payments. Many of these providers are larger than us and have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources.
Several other factors related to our business may have a significant impact on
our operating results from year to year. For example, the accounting rules
governing the timing of revenue recognition in the software industry are complex
and it can be difficult to estimate when we will recognize revenue generated by
a given transaction. Factors such as maturity of the software product licensed,
payment terms, creditworthiness of the customer, and timing of delivery or
acceptance of our products often cause revenues related to sales generated in
one period to be deferred and recognized in later periods. For arrangements in
which services revenue is deferred, related direct and incremental costs may
also be deferred. Additionally, while the majority of our contracts are
denominated in the United States dollar, a substantial portion of our sales are
made, and some of our expenses are incurred, in the local currency of countries
other than the United States. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates in a given
period may result in the recognition of gains or losses for that period. Also
during the year ended September 30, 2007, we entered into two interest rate
swaps with a commercial bank whereby we pay a fixed rate of 5.375% and 4.90% and
receive a floating rate indexed to the 3-month LIBOR from the counterparty on a
notional amount of $75 million and $50 million, respectively. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, the Company elected 1-month LIBOR as the
variable-rate benchmark for its revolving facility and changed its interest rate
to 5.195%. The Company also amended its interest rate swap on the $75 million
notional amount from 3-month LIBOR to 1-month LIBOR. This basis swap did not
impact the maturity date of the interest rate swap or the accounting.
Fluctuations in interest rates in a given period may result in the recognition
of gains or losses for that period.
We continue to seek ways to grow through both organic sources and acquisitions.
We continually look for potential acquisitions designed to improve our
solutions' breadth or provide access to new markets. As part of our acquisition
strategy, we seek acquisition candidates that are strategic, capable of being
integrated into our operating environment, and financially accretive to our
financial performance.
Acquisitions
On September 14, 2009, we entered into an agreement to acquire certain
intellectual property, customer contracts, and working capital related to global
card issuing and merchant acquiring solutions for 4.25 million British Sterling
(approximately $7.0 million U.S. dollars). The acquisition is subject to certain
third party consents, as well as customary closing contingencies. The
acquisition is expected to close during the month of November.
Backlog
Included in backlog estimates are all software license fees, maintenance fees
and services specified in executed contracts, as well as revenues from assumed
contract renewals to the extent that we believe recognition of the related
revenue will occur within the corresponding backlog period. We have historically
included assumed renewals in backlog estimates based upon automatic renewal
provisions in the executed contract and our historic experience with customer
renewal rates.
Our 60-month backlog estimate represents expected revenues from existing
customers using the following key assumptions:
• Maintenance fees are assumed to exist for the duration of the license term
for those contracts in which the committed maintenance term is less than
the committed license term.
• License and facilities management arrangements are assumed to renew at the end of their committed term at a rate consistent with our historical experiences.
• Non-recurring license arrangements are assumed to renew as recurring revenue streams.
• Foreign currency exchange rates are assumed to remain constant over the 60-month backlog period for those contracts stated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
• Our pricing policies and practices are assumed to remain constant over the 60-month backlog period.
In computing our 60-month backlog estimate, the following items are specifically
not taken into account:
• Anticipated increases in transaction volumes in customer systems.
• Optional annual uplifts or inflationary increases in recurring fees.
• Services engagements, other than facilities management, are not assumed to renew over the 60-month backlog period.
• The potential impact of merger activity within our markets and/or customers is not reflected in the computation of our 60-month backlog estimate.
The following table sets forth our 60-month backlog estimate, by geographic region, as of September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in millions). Dollar amounts reflect foreign currency exchange rates as of each period end.
September 30, June 30, March 31, December 31,
2009 2009 2009 2008
Americas $ 827 $ 817 $ 791 $ 771
EMEA 504 504 466 480
Asia/Pacific 156 155 153 156
Total $ 1,487 $ 1,476 $ 1,410 $ 1,407
|
Included in our 60-month backlog estimates are amounts expected to be recognized
during the initial license term of customer contracts ("Committed Backlog") and
amounts expected to be recognized from assumed renewals of existing customer
contracts ("Renewal Backlog"). Amounts expected to be recognized from assumed
contract renewals are based on the Company's historical renewal experience. The
estimated Committed Backlog and Renewal Backlog as of September 30, 2009 is
$734 million and $753 million, respectively.
We also estimate 12-month backlog, segregated between monthly recurring and
non-recurring revenues, using a methodology consistent with the 60-month backlog
estimate. Monthly recurring revenues include all monthly license fees,
maintenance fees and processing services fees. Non-recurring revenues include
other software license fees and services. Amounts included in our 12-month
backlog estimate assume renewal of one-time license fees on a monthly fee basis
if such renewal is expected to occur in the next 12 months. The following table
sets forth our 12-month backlog estimate, by geographic region, as of
September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in
millions). Dollar amounts reflect foreign currency exchange rates as of each
period end.
September 30, 2009 June 30, 2009
Monthly Non- Monthly Non-
Recurring Recurring Total Recurring Recurring Total
Americas $ 146 $ 41 $ 187 $ 145 $ 44 $ 189
EMEA 79 36 115 77 40 117
Asia/Pacific 27 13 40 28 15 43
Total $ 252 $ 90 $ 342 $ 250 $ 99 $ 349
March 31, 2009 December 31, 2008
Monthly Non- Monthly Non-
Recurring Recurring Total Recurring Recurring Total
Americas $ 139 $ 43 $ 182 $ 133 $ 40 $ 173
EMEA 72 43 115 73 37 110
Asia/Pacific 28 10 38 28 14 42
Total $ 239 $ 96 $ 335 $ 234 $ 91 $ 325
|
Estimates of future financial results are inherently unreliable. Our backlog
estimates require substantial judgment and are based on a number of assumptions
as described above. These assumptions may turn out to be inaccurate or wrong,
including for reasons outside of management's control. For example, our
customers may attempt to renegotiate or terminate their contracts for a number
of reasons, including mergers, changes in their financial condition, or general
changes in economic conditions in the customer's industry or geographic
location, or we may experience delays in the development or delivery of products
or services specified in customer contracts which may cause the actual renewal
rates and amounts to differ from historical experiences. Changes in foreign
currency exchange rates may also impact the amount of revenue actually
recognized in future periods. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that
amounts included in backlog estimates will actually generate the specified
revenues or that the actual revenues will be generated within the corresponding
12-month or 60-month period. Additionally, because backlog estimates are
operating metrics, the estimates are not subject to the same level of internal
review or controls as a GAAP financial measure.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Reclassifications
During 2009, we refined our definition of cost of software licenses fees in
order to better conform to industry practice. Our definition of cost of software
license fees has been revised to include third-party software royalties as well
as the amortization of purchased and developed software for resale. Previously,
cost of software license fees also included certain costs associated with
maintaining software products that have already been developed and directing
future product development efforts. These costs included human resource costs
and other incidental costs related to product management, documentation,
publications and education. These costs have now been reclassified to research
and development and cost of maintenance and services. As a result of this change
in definition of cost of software license fees, we reclassified $0.9 million and
$7.9 million to cost of maintenance and services and research and development,
respectively, from cost of software licenses fees in the accompanying statement
. . .
|
|