|
Quotes & Info
|
| CWT > SEC Filings for CWT > Form 10-Q/A on 7-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
• changes in regulatory commissions' policies and procedures;
• the timeliness of regulatory commissions' actions concerning rate relief;
• changes in the capital markets and access to sufficient capital on satisfactory terms;
• new legislation;
• changes in accounting valuations and estimates;
• changes in accounting treatment for regulated companies, including adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, if required;
• electric power interruptions;
• increases in suppliers' prices and the availability of supplies including water and power;
• fluctuations in interest rates;
• changes in environmental compliance and water quality requirements;
• acquisitions and the ability to successfully integrate acquired companies;
• the ability to successfully implement business plans;
• civil disturbances or terrorist threats or acts, or apprehension about the possible future occurrences of acts of this type;
• the involvement of the United States in war or other hostilities;
• our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;
• labor relations matters as we negotiate with the unions;
• implementation of new information technology systems;
• restrictive covenants in or changes to the credit ratings on current or future debt that could increase financing costs or affect the ability to borrow, make payments on debt, or pay dividends;
• general economic conditions, including changes in customer growth patterns and our ability to collect billed revenue from customers;
• changes in customer water use patterns and the effects of conservation;
• the impact of weather on water sales and operating results;
• the ability to satisfy requirements related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulations on internal controls; and
• the risks set forth in "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this quarterly report.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, investors are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as
of the date of this quarterly report or as of the date of any document
incorporated by reference in this report, as applicable. When considering
forward-looking statements, investors should keep in mind the cautionary
statements in this quarterly report and the documents incorporated by reference.
We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to
update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We maintain our accounting records in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and as directed by the
regulatory commissions to which we are subject. The process of preparing
financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates and
assumptions on the part of management. The estimates and assumptions used by
management are based on historical experience and our understanding of current
facts and circumstances. Management believes that the following accounting
policies are critical because they involve a higher degree of complexity and
judgment, and can have a material impact on our results of operations and
financial condition. These policies and their key characteristics are discussed
in detail in the 2008 Form 10-K. They include:
• revenue recognition;
• expense balancing and memorandum accounts;
• modified cost balancing accounts;
• regulatory utility accounting;
• income taxes;
• pension benefits;
• workers' compensation, general liability and other claims; and
• contingencies
For the period ended June 30, 2009, there were no changes in the methodology for computing critical accounting estimates, no additional accounting estimates met the standards for critical accounting policies, and there were no material changes to the important assumptions underlying the critical accounting estimates.
Rate increases $ 19,199
Decrease in usage by existing customers (11,941 )
Usage by new customers 3,390
Net revenue decrease due to WRAM and MCBA (352 )
Other 791
Net operating revenue increase $ 11,087
|
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
General Rate Case (GRC) Increases $ 14,131
Purchased Water Offset Increases 4,406
Balancing Account Adjustments 248
Step Rate Increases 414
Total Increase in Rates $ 19,199
|
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $100.7 million for the second quarter of 2009,
versus $91.1 million for the same period in 2008, an 11% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power, and pump
taxes. It represents the largest component of total operating expenses,
accounting for approximately 41% of total operating expenses in the second
quarter of 2009. Water production expenses increased 3% compared to the same
period last year due to increased cost of purchased water and purchased power,
although usage was down.
Sources of water as a percent of total water production are listed in the
following table:
Three Months Ended June 30
2009 2008
Well production 49 % 50 %
Purchased 47 % 46 %
Surface 4 % 4 %
|
Our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Washington Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water obtain all of their water supply from wells. The components of water production costs are shown in the table below:
Three Months Ended June 30
2009 2008 Change
Purchased water $ 31,654 $ 30,785 $ 869
Purchased power 7,584 6,965 619
Pump taxes 2,464 2,599 (135 )
Total $ 41,702 $ 40,349 $ 1,353
|
Purchased water costs increased due to price increases from water wholesalers.
Total water production, measured in acre feet, decreased by 11% during the
second quarter of 2009 as compared with the second quarter of 2008 due to lower
customer usage primarily attributed to cooler weather.
Administrative and general expense and other operations expense increased 27% to
$33.7 million. The primary increase was due to increased pension and
postretirement benefit costs, other benefit costs, and outside legal services.
Effective January 1, 2009, wage increases became effective and there was an
increase in the number of employees. At June 30, 2009, there were 956 employees
and at June 30, 2008, there were 922 employees.
Maintenance expenses decreased by 13% to $4.3 million in the second quarter of
2009 compared to $4.9 million in the second quarter of 2008, due to decrease in
main and service repairs. Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$1.0 million, or 11%, because of 2008 capital additions.
Federal and state income taxes charged to operating expenses and other income
and expenses increased $1.1 million, from a provision of $6.7 million in the
second quarter of 2008 to $7.8 million in the second quarter of 2009, due to an
increase in pretax income. We expect the effective tax rate to be between 38%
and 40% for fiscal year 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Non-regulated revenue, net of related expenses, and gain on sale of non-utility
property reflected net income of $1.5 million for the second quarter of 2009,
compared to a gain of $0.4 million in the same period last year, which is an
increase of $1.1 million. The change from the prior year is due to a favorable
change to the cash surrender value of the life insurance contracts associated
with our benefit plans.
Interest Expense
Total interest expense, net of interest capitalized, increased $0.6 million to
$5.3 million for the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period last
year. This increase was attributable to the additional interest on the first
mortgage bonds issued in April less increased capitalized interest on
construction activity.
Rate increases $ 30,785
Decrease in usage by existing customers (17,151 )
Increase in usage by new customers 5,818
Net revenue increase due to WRAM and MCBA 4,631
Other 695
Net changes in operating revenue $ 24,778
|
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
General Rate Case (GRC) Increase $ 23,115
Purchased Water Offset Increase 6,455
Step Rate Increase 798
Balancing Account Adjustments 417
Total increase in rates $ 30,785
|
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $181.1 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009, versus $159.2 million for the same period in 2008, a 14% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power and pump
taxes. Water production expense represents the largest component of total
operating expenses, accounting for approximately 39% of total operating
expenses. Water production expenses increased $4.9 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2009, or 7% compared to the same period last year due to
increased cost of purchased water and purchased power.
Sources of water production as a percent of total water production are listed on the following table:
Six Months Ended June 30
2009 2008
Well production 47 % 46 %
Purchased 49 % 50 %
Surface 4 % 4 %
|
Total 100 % 100 %
Our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Washington Water, New Mexico Water and
Hawaii Water, obtain all of their water supply from wells. The components of
water production costs are shown in the table below:
Six Months Ended June 30
2009 2008 Change
Purchased water $ 54,594 $ 51,496 $ 3,098
Purchased power 12,127 10,419 1,708
Pump taxes 3,849 3,792 57
Total $ 70,570 $ 65,707 $ 4,863
|
Purchased water cost increased due to higher prices from wholesalers. Included
in purchased water are credits received from certain wholesale suppliers and the
sale of unused water rights. There were no significant credits during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008. The increase in purchased power
and pump taxes is due to the acquisitions in Hawaii last year.
Administration and general and other operations expenses were $65.0 million,
increasing $12.9 million, or 25%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
primary increase was due to the increased pension and postretirement benefit
costs, other benefit costs, and outside legal services. Payroll charged to
operating expense increased $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Wages for union employees increased 3.1%, effective January 1, 2009. Overall
payroll costs (expensed and capitalized) increased 6.9% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, due to increases in the number of employees and higher wage
rates. At June 30, 2009, there were 956 employees and at June 30, 2008, there
were 922 employees.
Maintenance expense was down for the six months ended June 30, 2009, decreasing
$0.1 million, or 1%. Depreciation and amortization expense increased
$2.0 million, or 11%, because of increased capital expenditures in 2008.
Federal and state income taxes increased $2.6 million, or 38%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, due to the change in taxable income. We expect the
effective tax rate to be between 38% and 40% for 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Other income, net of related expenses was $2.0 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to $0.3 million for the first six-months of 2008. The
change from the prior year is due to an increase in non-utility service revenues
and a gain on the sale of non-utility property. In addition, other expense was
reduced by a gain in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts associated
with our benefit plans of $1.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. In
the prior year we recorded a loss (reduction) in cash surrender value of life
insurance contracts associated with our benefit plans of $1 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008. The cash surrender value is determined in
part by the market of certain underlining funds, the value of which reflects
changes in the stock market. Due to a significant increase in the stock market
in the first six months of 2009, there was a corresponding impact to the cash
surrender value of the life insurance contracts.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense increased $0.4 million to $9.7 million for the period ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This
increase was attributable to the additional interest on the first mortgage bonds
issued in April 2009 less increased capitalized interest on construction
activity.
REGULATORY MATTERS
Rates and Regulations
The state regulatory commissions have plenary powers setting rates and operating
standards. As such, state commission decisions significantly impact our
revenues, earnings, and cash flows. The amounts discussed herein are generally
annual amounts, unless specifically stated, and the financial impact to recorded
revenue is expected to occur over a 12-month period from the effective date of
the decision. In California, water utilities are required to make several
different types of filings. Most filings result in rate changes that remain in
place until the next General Rate Case (GRC). As explained below, surcharges and
surcredits to recover balancing and memorandum accounts as well as interim rate
true-ups are temporary rate changes, which have specific time frames for
recovery.
GRCs, step rate increase filings, and offset filings change rates to amounts
that will remain in effect until the next GRC. The CPUC follows a rate case
plan, which requires Cal Water to file a GRC for each of its 24 regulated
operating districts every three years. In a GRC proceeding, the CPUC not only
considers the utility's rate setting requests, but may also consider other
issues that affect the utility's rates and operations. Effective in 2004, Cal
Water's GRC schedule was shifted from a calendar year to a fiscal year with test
years commencing on July 1st of each year. The CPUC is generally required to
issue its GRC decision prior to the first day of the test year or authorize
interim rates. As such, Cal Water's GRC decisions, prior to 2005, were generally
issued in the fourth quarter. Effective with the 2009 GRC, the processing time
is scheduled for eighteen months with rates effective on January 1, 2011.
Between GRC filings utilities may file escalation rate increases, which allow
the utility to recover cost increases, primarily from inflation and incremental
investment, during the second and third years of the rate case cycle. However,
escalation rate increases are subject to a weather-normalized earnings test.
Under the earnings test, the CPUC may reduce the escalation rate increase to
prevent the utility from earning in excess of the authorized rate of return for
that district.
In addition, utilities are entitled to file offset filings. Offset filings may
be filed to adjust revenues for construction projects authorized in GRCs when
the plant is placed in service or for rate changes charged to the Company for
purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes (referred to as "offsettable
expenses"). Such rate changes approved in offset filings remain in effect until
a GRC is approved. Additional information on the Company's regulatory process is
described in its annual report on Form 10-K dated March 2, 2009.
Remaining Unrecorded Balances from Previously Authorized Balancing Accounts
Recoveries/Refunds
The total of unrecorded, under-collected memorandum and balancing accounts was
approximately $0.9 million as of June 30, 2009.
2009 Regulatory Activity to Date
Cost of Capital Application
On May 1, 2008, Cal Water filed an application in compliance with the Rate Case
Plan to establish an allowable cost of capital for 2009, 2010, and 2011. The
cost of capital evaluation includes such issues as the authorized return on
equity, the cost of debt, and the equitable capital structure for Cal Water.
This application, A.08-05-002, was considered along with similar applications
from two other multi-district California water utilities. On May 7, 2009, the
CPUC issued D.09-05-019 ruling on these issues and adopting a cost of capital
for Cal Water for 2009. The CPUC authorized Cal Water a 10.20% return on equity,
the same provision as had been last adopted by the CPUC for Cal Water in 2007
and 2008. The decision also allowed a capital structure of 53% equity and 47%
debt. Finally, the decision also allowed a temporary interest rate balancing
account to insulate the utilities and their ratepayers from volatile debt
financing costs due to market uncertainty. The total effect of the decision was
a rate decrease, of $1.8 million effective June 2009 through July 2010.
As of July 31, 2009, the CPUC had not yet ruled on a proposed all-party
settlement in the proceeding that would establish a mechanism for adjusting
return on equity in 2010 and 2011. Cal Water cannot predict whether or when the
CPUC may issue a decision regarding these issues.
2009 California General Rate Case Filing
On July 2, 2009, Cal Water filed its required application for a general review
of rates for all operating districts and general operations. The application,
A.09-07-001, requests an annual increase in rates of $70.6 million on January 1,
2011, $24.8 million on January 1, 2012, and $24.8 million on January 1, 2013.
The filing marks the beginning of an eighteen month review process. As a result,
and based on past experience, Cal Water cannot predict at this time the ultimate
rate change the Commission will order. The Commission is generally required
under state law to allow Cal Water interim rates and an effective date of
January 1, 2011 if a decision is not rendered in the proceeding by that date.
Request for MTBE regulatory treatment
On July 10, 2009, Cal Water filed an application requesting the CPUC adopt
ratemaking treatment of proceeds from its partial settlement of MTBE
contamination litigation. Cal Water has requested that all of the proceeds be
reinvested in infrastructure to treat or replace MTBE-contaminated facilities.
In addition, Cal Water has requested that 50% of the reinvestment be included in
rate base upon which Cal Water could earn its authorized fair and reasonable
rate of return. The remaining 50% of the settlement proceeds would be included
in rate base as contributions in aid of construction which does not earn a
return. Cal Water has also requested specific regulatory treatment of future
settlement or litigation proceeds that may occur in the consolidated MTBE cases.
The CPUC has also opened a "rulemaking" proceeding, R.09-03-014, to consider,
among other things, whether it should adopt a standard policy for ratemaking
treatment of litigation proceeds. This rulemaking is scheduled to be concluded
in the second quarter of 2010. The CPUC has previously authorized a wide range
of regulatory treatments of contamination litigation proceeds. Due to the open
policy proceeding and the considerable variability in the CPUC's past treatment
of contamination litigation proceeds, Cal Water cannot predict the outcome or
timing of a decision in this proceeding at this time.
Washington 2009 General Rate Case Filing
On May 12, 2009, Washington Water Service Company filed a general rate increase
for its regulated operations with the Washington Utilities and Transportation
Commission (WUTC). Washington Water requested increases of $1.9 million on an
annual basis. On July 30, 2009, the WUTC agreed to a revised revenue requirement
of $1.2 million in additional annual revenue and revised rates.
Other 2009 Regulatory filings
In January and February 2009, Cal Water filed advice letters to offset increased
purchased water and pump tax rates in eight of its regulated districts totaling
$11.7 million in annual revenue. Under CPUC advice letter processing rules, Cal
Water charges the rates to its customers upon filing of the expense offset
advice letter. These rates were approved in late February 2009. However, expense
offsets are dollar-for-dollar increases in revenue to match increased expenses
and interact with the WRAM and MCBA mechanisms so that net operating income is
not affected by an offset increase.
In January 2009 the City of Hawthorne approved Cal Water's requested rate
increase for its leased water system. The increase will take effect in phases,
with a $0.8 million annual increase in February 2009, a $1.0 million annual
increase in July 2009, and a $1.2 million annual increase in January 2010.
In January 2009 Cal Water filed an application to the CPUC for approvals and
consents related to its secured debt offering, which was completed on April 17,
2009. The application included, among other things, requests for (i) a waiver of
. . .
|
|