|
Quotes & Info
|
| KAMN > SEC Filings for KAMN > Form 10-K on 26-Feb-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
26-Feb-2009
Annual Report
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to provide readers of our consolidated financial statements with the perspectives of management. The MD&A presents in narrative form information regarding our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. This will allow our shareholders to obtain a comprehensive understanding of our businesses, strategies, current trends and future prospects. Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in this Form 10-K. Unless otherwise noted, this MD&A relates only to results from continuing operations. All years presented reflect the classification of Kaman Music's financial results as discontinued operations.
MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
During the past year our company has experienced a variety of significant developments, most notably several changes in senior leadership. Neal J. Keating has completed his first year of service as our Chief Executive Officer; Gregory L. Steiner was appointed President of Kaman Aerospace Group and given responsibility for the management of all aerospace operations; and, most recently, William C. Denninger assumed the role of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer following the retirement of Robert M. Garneau. From an organizational perspective, recent acquisitions (including the acquisition of Brookhouse, the largest in our history) and the settlement of our SH-2G helicopter contract with the Royal Australian Navy have had a noticeable impact on our business.
Since his arrival, Mr. Steiner has established a senior level administrative team focused exclusively on our aerospace business. We continue to explore other opportunities to realign the operations of our Aerospace business in order to better leverage our investments, enhance our overall profitability, and better position ourselves to achieve our goal of sustainable growth in the evolving aerospace market. We believe that by aligning the Aerospace operations for growth and efficiency and eliminating organizational redundancies we will be able to improve our market focus and execute our strategies more successfully.
These changes have caused us to undertake an evaluation of our organizational and business structures, taking into consideration various internal and external developments over the past year. We are also evaluating the nature of the financial data being reviewed by senior corporate management. This has led us to consider, among other things, the level of detail and volume of such information, as well as the advantages to be gained by allocating corporate costs to each of our reporting segments. These ongoing studies may lead to actions being taken that could result in a change to our segment reporting information during 2009.
OVERVIEW OF BUSINESS
Kaman Corporation is composed of five business segments:
· Aerostructures, a subcontract supplier for commercial and military aircraft;
· Precision Products, a producer of fuzing devices and memory and measuring systems for a variety of applications;
· Helicopters, a provider of upgrades and support for its existing fleet as well as a subcontractor for other aerospace manufacturers;
· Specialty Bearings, a manufacturer of high-performance mechanical products used in aviation, marine, hydropower, and other industrial applications; and
· Industrial Distribution, the third largest power transmission/motion control industrial distributor in North America.
The following is a summary of key events that occurred in 2008:
· Our net sales from continuing operations increased 15.4% in 2008 compared to
2007.
· Our net earnings from continuing operations decreased 3.8% in 2008 compared to 2007.
· Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations declined to $1.38 in 2008, a decrease of 5.5% compared to 2007.
· Neal J. Keating became Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2008 and Chairman on March 1, 2008.
· Gregory L. Steiner was appointed President of our Aerospace Group on July 7, 2008. He has responsibility for all four of our aerospace reporting segments.
· William C. Denninger was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on December 1, 2008.
· The Industrial Distribution and Specialty Bearings segments experienced strong growth in sales and operating profit.
· Our Helicopters segment reached an agreement with the Commonwealth of Australia that terminated the SH-2G(A) Super Seasprite program, with a mutual release of claims.
· On June 12, 2008, we acquired Brookhouse Holdings, Limited (Brookhouse), a leader in the design and manufacture of composite aerostructures, aerospace tooling, and repair and overhaul services based in Darwen, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
· In 2008, our Industrial Distribution segment completed the acquisitions of Industrial Supply Corp. (ISC) of Richmond, Virginia and Industrial Rubber & Mechanics, Incorporated (INRUMEC) of Puerto Rico.
· We signed a contract with Boeing for the Air Force's A-10 re-wing program, with a potential sales value of approximately $100 million.
· In August 2008, we completed the purchase of the portion of the Bloomfield campus that Kaman Aerospace Corporation (of which the Helicopters segment forms a part) had leased from NAVAIR for many years.
· On October 29, 2008, we entered into a 4-year Term Loan Credit Agreement with various banks for $50 million.
RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Consolidated Results
Net Sales
2008 2007 2006
(in thousands)
Aerostructures $ 147,641 $ 102,362 $ 78,742
Precision Products 118,009 87,455 71,068
Helicopters 69,435 72,031 69,914
Specialty Bearings 141,540 124,009 106,278
Subtotal Aerospace Segments $ 476,625 $ 385,857 $ 326,002
Industrial Distribution 776,970 700,174 665,420
Total $ 1,253,595 $ 1,086,031 $ 991,422
$ change $ 167,564 $ 94,609 $ 81,544
% change 15.4 % 9.5 % 9.0 %
|
The increase in net sales for 2008 compared to 2007 was attributable to organic growth in all reporting segments except the Helicopters segment, as well as acquisitions in the Aerostructures and Industrial Distribution segments. In the aerospace businesses net sales increased due to the acquisition of Brookhouse, as well as organic sales growth resulting mainly from increased shipments for the Sikorsky BLACKHAWK helicopter cockpit program and the JPF fuze program. In the Industrial Distribution segment, sales to several new large national accounts, as well as the acquisition of ISC and INRUMEC, contributed to the increase for 2008 compared to 2007.
The growth in consolidated net sales for 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to increased shipments on several key product lines in our Aerostructures, Precision Products and Specialty Bearing segments, which were driven by the strong commercial and military aerospace markets. Our Industrial Distribution segment experienced sales growth during 2007 as a result of several new national accounts and continued strength in the Central and West regions.
Gross Profit
2008 2007 2006
(in thousands)
Gross Profit $ 332,137 $ 300,945 $ 271,423
$ change 31,192 29,522 39,972
% change 10.4 % 10.9 % 17.3 %
% of net sales 26.5 % 27.7 % 27.4 %
|
Gross profit for 2008 increased primarily due to the increased sales volume at the Industrial Distribution and Specialty Bearings segments and the absence of Australia SH-2G(A) program charges, which amounted to $6.4 million in 2007. These positive results were partially offset by a less favorable product mix for the Precision Products segment and the charges, excluding goodwill, recorded by the Aerostructures segment, as discussed more fully below. Gross profit as a percentage of sales (gross margin) decreased due to the aforementioned product mix changes at our Precision Products segment and the impact of the charges recorded at the Aerostructures Wichita facility.
The increase in the consolidated gross profit for 2007 was primarily attributable to sales growth in the Industrial Distribution and Specialty Bearings segments. In addition, the accrued contract loss charge related to additional anticipated cost growth on our Helicopters segment's Australia program was $3.3 million less in 2007 as compared to 2006. Gross profit as a percentage of sales (gross margin) improved slightly due to higher sales volume, increased efficiencies and a growing business base at all of our aerospace reporting segments.
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses (S,G&A)
2008 2007 2006
(in thousands)
S,G&A $ 259,282 $ 238,796 $ 223,549
$ change 20,486 15,247 11,866
% change 8.6 % 6.8 % 5.6 %
% of net sales 20.7 % 22.0 % 22.5 %
|
The increase in S,G&A for 2008 compared to 2007 is primarily due to the three acquisitions made during 2008, increases related to higher personnel costs across most of the reporting segments as well as increased bid and proposal activity in the aerospace segments. These increases were partially offset by lower expenses related to fringe benefits, incentive compensation and stock appreciation rights.
The increase in S,G&A for 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily driven by our Industrial Distribution segment and Corporate expenses. Our Industrial Distribution segment experienced higher operating expenses due to additional costs incurred for new branch openings and overall increased personnel costs. Corporate expense increased primarily as a result of an increase in stock compensation expense and higher group insurance expense. Total selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales decreased 0.5 percentage points in 2007 compared to 2006. This was primarily due to greater sales volume as well as continued cost control efforts.
Goodwill Impairment
During the second quarter of 2008, our Aerostructures Wichita, Kansas facility continued to experience production and quality issues, which, along with circumstances unique to each contract, resulted in the separate termination of two long-term contracts with Spirit AeroSystems and Shenyang Aircraft Corporation. These contracts, which represented significant work for the facility, were both loss contracts. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"), we test goodwill for potential impairment annually as of December 31 and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Due to the loss of the two major contracts as well as the continuing production and quality issues, management performed a goodwill impairment analysis for this reporting unit as of June 27, 2008.
Although we believe we are working through the production issues at our Aerostructures Wichita facility, its carrying value had increased significantly during the second quarter of 2008. This, combined with our loss of two long-term contracts and the quality and production issues at the facility, created a situation in which the estimated fair value of this reporting unit (the legal entity Plastic Fabricating Company, Inc.) was less than its carrying value. The resulting total non-cash goodwill impairment charge was $7.8 million, which represented the entire goodwill balance for this reporting unit prior to the charge. This charge is not deductible for tax purposes and represents a discrete item in our second quarter 2008 effective tax rate.
Operating Income
2008 2007 2006
(in thousands)
Operating Income $ 65,266 $ 64,728 $ 47,822
$ change 538 16,906 28,081
% change 0.8 % 35.4 % 142.2 %
% of net sales 5.2 % 6.0 % 4.8 %
|
The increase in operating income in 2008 compared to 2007 was due to increases in operating income at our Specialty Bearings, Helicopters and Industrial Distribution segments and a decrease in Corporate expenses. These changes were partially offset by lower operating income at our Aerostructures and Precision Products segments. The increase in operating income at our Specialty Bearings, Helicopters and Industrial Distribution segments was primarily a result of program developments and national accounts, as discussed further in the segment sections below, as well as the absence of $6.4 million in charges related to the Australia SH-2G(A) program recorded in 2007. Please refer to the individual segment discussions for details on their operating income.
The increase in operating income for 2007 was primarily attributable to stronger operating results in all of our reporting segments within the aerospace industry as further discussed in the following sections. Our Industrial Distribution segment's operating income was lower in 2007 compared to 2006 partially as a result of a variety of expenses incurred for start-up costs relative to several new national account contracts.
Loss on Ineffective Hedge Contracts
In connection with the acquisition of Brookhouse, we assumed two foreign currency hedge contracts originally intended to hedge forecasted cash flows on a significant U.S. dollar denominated contract. During the third quarter of 2008, we determined these hedges were ineffective, due to a significant shift in the timing of the forecasted cash flows. Therefore, we cancelled the contracts during the third quarter, resulting in a loss of $1.6 million being included in non-operating income in our consolidated statements of operations.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense generally consists of interest charged on the revolving credit facility and other borrowings offset by interest income. Net interest expense for 2008 was $3.0 million as compared to $6.3 million in 2007. The decrease in net interest expense was primarily due to the repayment of a significant portion of our revolving credit line as of December 31, 2007, using the proceeds from the sale of the Music segment, as well as the redemption of all outstanding convertible debentures in late 2007. In the second quarter of 2008, we borrowed against our revolving credit line again to fund working capital requirements and the Brookhouse acquisition.
Net interest expense for 2007 remained relatively flat compared to 2006 primarily due to there having been a similar level of borrowings during 2007 as compared to 2006. Net interest expense in both years generally consisted of interest charged on the revolving credit facility and the convertible debentures offset by interest income.
Effective Income Tax Rate
Effective income tax rate 40.7 % 36.6 % 39.4 %
The effective tax rate represents the combined federal, state and foreign tax effects attributable to pretax earnings for the year. The increase in the effective tax rate for 2008 compared to 2007 is due to the non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $7.8 million recorded in the second quarter of 2008 for our Aerostructures Wichita facility.
The 2007 effective tax rate was favorably impacted by one-time adjustments resulting from tax law changes in the U.S., as well as internationally, as compared to 2006.
Other Matters
The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection ("CTDEP") has given us conditional approval for reclassification of groundwater in the vicinity of the Moosup, CT facility consistent with the character of the area. This facility is currently being held for disposal. We have substantially completed the process of connecting neighboring properties to public drinking water in accordance with such approval and in coordination with the CTDEP and local authorities. We anticipate the water connection project will be completed in early 2009. Site characterization of the environmental condition of the property began in 2008 and is expected to continue during 2009.
In connection with the sale of the Music segment in 2007, we assumed responsibility for meeting certain requirements of the Act that applied to our transfer of the New Hartford, Connecticut, facility leased by that segment for guitar manufacturing purposes ("Ovation"). Under the Act, those responsibilities essentially consist of assessing the site's environmental conditions and remediating environmental impairments, if any, caused by Ovation's operations prior to the sale. The site is a multi-tenant industrial park, in which Ovation and other unrelated entities lease space. The environmental assessment process began in 2008 and will continue during 2009. The estimate of our portion of the cost to assess the environmental conditions and remediate this site is $2.2 million, unchanged from previously reported estimates.
In August 2008, we completed the purchase of the portion of the Bloomfield campus that Kaman Aerospace Corporation (of which the Helicopters segment forms a part) had leased from NAVAIR for many years. In connection with the purchase, we have assumed responsibility for environmental remediation at the facility as may be required under the Connecticut Transfer Act (the "Transfer Act") and we continue the effort to define the scope of the remediation that will be required by the CTDEP. The transaction was recorded by taking the undiscounted remediation liability of $20,768 and discounting it at a rate of 8% to its present value. The fair value of the Navy Property asset, which approximates the discounted present value of the assumed environmental liability of $10,258, has been included in Property, Plant and Equipment as of December 31, 2008. This remediation process will take many years to complete.
We have accrued $2.4 million for environmental compliance at our recently acquired Brookhouse facilities. We are in the early stages of assessing the work that may be required, which may result in a change to this accrual.
Combined Aerospace Segment Results
The following table presents selected financial data for our combined Aerospace
segments:
2008 2007 2006
Net sales:
Aerostructures $ 147,641 $ 102,362 $ 78,742
Precision Products 118,009 87,455 71,068
Helicopters 69,435 72,031 69,914
Specialty Bearings 141,540 124,009 106,278
Total Aerospace segments $ 476,625 $ 385,857 $ 326,002
$ change 90,768 59,855 38,057
% change 23.5 % 18.4 % 13.2 %
2008 2007 2006
Operating (loss) income:
Aerostructures $ (5,925 ) $ 13,219 $ 11,538
Precision Products 7,299 10,546 7,750
Helicopters 10,066 2,631 222
Specialty Bearings 50,168 41,387 28,630
Total Aerospace segments $ 61,608 $ 67,783 $ 48,140
$ change (6,175 ) 19,643 14,855
% change -9.1 % 40.8 % 44.6 %
|
The Market
Both the commercial and military aerospace markets remained strong during most of 2008. We believe this positive trend will continue for the military aerospace markets in 2009; however, as a result of the downturn in the global economy, we do not foresee the commercial aerospace market continuing to perform at its 2008 levels. We believe the effect of the downturn in the commercial aerospace market will be somewhat mitigated by our existing military work.
Strategies
Kaman's strategies for the Aerospace segments are:
· Aerostructures: Expand our global market position as a supplier of complex, composite and metallic structures and integrated subsystems for military and commercial aircraft.
· Precision Products: Become the established leader in bomb and missile fuzes, specialized memory products, precision measuring devices and electro-optic sensor systems for military and commercial applications.
· Helicopters: Leverage systems knowledge and lean manufacturing to take advantage of emerging assembly/subcontracting and after-market/retrofit opportunities as helicopter prime manufacturers focus on system design, integration, and final assembly.
· Specialty Bearings: Maintain leadership in product technical performance and application engineering support while staying ahead of the curve in product technology enhancement, lean manufacturing techniques and lead time reduction.
Aerostructures Segment
2008 2007 2006
(in thousands)
Net Sales $ 147,641 $ 102,362 $ 78,742
$ change 45,279 23,620 23,759
% change 44.2 % 30.0 % 43.2 %
Operating (Loss) Income $ (5,925 ) $ 13,219 $ 11,538
$ change (19,144 ) 1,681 7,763
% change -144.8 % 14.6 % 205.6 %
% of net sales -4.0 % 12.9 % 14.7 %
Backlog on contract $ 260,771 $ 130,598 $ 84,178
|
The growth in net sales for 2008 compared to 2007 was partially attributable to $32.3 million of sales by Brookhouse, which was acquired in mid-June 2008. The remainder of the sales growth was due to higher production levels for the Sikorsky BLACK HAWK helicopter program at our Jacksonville facility, offset partially by a decrease in sales at the Aerostructures Wichita facility due to the production and operational issues discussed below. During 2008, the segment delivered 125 cockpits under the BLACKHAWK helicopter program compared to 86 cockpits delivered in 2007. The segment's 2008 operating income was significantly impacted by charges of $13.0 million related to goodwill impairment and the write-off of inventory and tooling costs at the Aerostructures Wichita facility.
The growth in net sales in 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to higher production levels and increased shipments to Sikorsky for the BLACK HAWK helicopter program. During 2007, we delivered 30 more cockpits than in 2006. Additional Sikorsky offload work, Boeing 777 shipments and other Boeing commercial work also contributed to the increase in sales in 2007. Operating income increased primarily as a result of greater sales volume for the Sikorsky BLACK HAWK program. These positive operating results were offset partially by certain adverse adjustments resulting from a rapid increase in manpower, production inefficiencies and excess inventory experienced at the Aerostructures Wichita facility during the ramp up of several programs discussed below.
Major Programs
The Sikorsky BLACK HAWK helicopter cockpit program includes the installation of all wiring harnesses, hydraulic assemblies, control pedals and sticks, seat tracks, pneumatic lines, and the composite structure that holds the windscreen for cockpits on most models of the BLACK HAWK helicopter. In June 2008, Sikorsky placed an order for an additional 238 cockpits bringing total orders placed to date to 549 cockpits. The total potential value of this program is at least $250 million, with deliveries on current orders continuing through 2010. Through December 31, 2008, a total of 283 cockpits had been delivered under this contract.
In mid July 2008, the company signed a long-term requirements contract with Boeing for the production of wing control surfaces (inboard and outboard flaps, slats and deceleron assemblies) for the U.S. Air Force's A-10 fleet, with initial deliveries scheduled to begin in early 2010. Full rate production is expected to begin in 2011 with an average of approximately 47 shipsets per year through 2015. This multiyear contract has a potential value in excess of $100 million; however, annual quantities will vary, as they are dependent upon the orders Boeing receives from the U.S. Air Force.
The production of structural wing subassemblies for the Boeing C-17 continues to be important in maintaining a sufficient business base at the Jacksonville facility and will remain so until work under the A-10 program ramps up in 2010. During 2008, we received an order for an additional 30 shipsets, which will extend production under this program through 2010. Additionally, in late 2007 we signed a seven-year follow-on contract with Boeing for the production of fixed wing trailing edge assemblies for the Boeing 777 and 767 aircraft. Shipments under this program were delayed during the second half of the year, due to the International Association of Machinists (IAM) strike at the Boeing Company. Although Boeing was successful in reaching an agreement with the striking machinists, shipments remained behind schedule during the fourth quarter of 2008.
At Aerostructures Wichita, we continue our efforts to implement corrective actions to resolve personnel, quality and production process issues. These issues arose in connection with the facility's rapid expansion to accommodate the ramp up for three contracts awarded in 2006, Spirit AeroSystems and Shenyang Aircraft Corporation for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner program and Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation for the Canadian MH-92 helicopter program. During 2008, Aerostructures Wichita's lack of certification status for a large portion of the year adversely affected our ability to fully perform our obligations under certain contracts. These circumstances, combined with other factors affecting specific programs, resulted in the termination of two of the contracts awarded in 2006. We received a notice from Spirit AeroSystems in June 2008 seeking a default termination of its contract. Management has cooperated with Spirit to achieve the customer's production objectives while reserving our legal rights with respect to the
. . .
|
|