|
Quotes & Info
|
| GTXI > SEC Filings for GTXI > Form 10-Q on 6-Nov-2008 | All Recent SEC Filings |
6-Nov-2008
Quarterly Report
• potential future licensing fees, milestone payments, and royalty payments including any milestone payments or royalty payments that we may receive under our collaborative arrangements with Ipsen Limited and Merck & Co., Inc.;
• our and our collaborator's ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals of our product candidates and any related restrictions, limitations, and/or warnings;
• our and our collaborator's ability to market, commercialize and achieve market acceptance for our product candidates or products that we may develop;
• our and our collaborators' ability to generate additional product candidates for clinical testing;
• our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our business without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others; and
• our estimates regarding the sufficiency of our cash resources.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "anticipates," "believes," "could," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "plans," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "should," "will," "would" and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events, are based on
assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. We discuss many of these
risks in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in greater detail in the section
entitled "Risk Factors" under Part II, Item 1A below. Given these uncertainties,
you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also,
forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of
the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should read this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q and the documents that we incorporate by reference in and
have filed as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, completely and
with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially
different from what we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the
reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any
forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the
future.
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development
and commercialization of small molecules that selectively target hormone
pathways to treat cancer, osteoporosis and bone loss, muscle loss and other
serious medical conditions. We are developing toremifene citrate, a selective
estrogen receptor modulator, or SERM, in two separate clinical programs in men:
first, toremifene 80 mg in a completed pivotal Phase III clinical trial for the
prevention of fractures and treatment of other estrogen deficiency side effects
of androgen deprivation therapy, or ADT, for prostate cancer, and second,
toremifene 20 mg in an ongoing pivotal Phase III clinical trial for the
prevention of prostate cancer in high risk men with precancerous prostate
lesions called high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or high grade
PIN. In the first quarter of 2008, we announced that the Phase III clinical
trial results for toremifene 80 mg for the prevention of fractures and treatment
of other estrogen deficiency side effects of ADT for prostate cancer showed that
toremifene 80 mg reduced new morphometric vertebral fractures, met other key
endpoints of bone mineral density, or BMD, lipid profiles and gynecomastia, and
also showed that toremifene 80 mg demonstrated a reduction in hot flashes in a
subset of patients. We plan to submit a New Drug Application, or NDA, for
toremifene 80 mg to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in the fourth
quarter of 2008. We have licensed to Ipsen Limited, or Ipsen, exclusive rights
in the European Union, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Lichtenstein and the
Commonwealth of Independent States, which we refer to collectively as the
European Territory, to develop and commercialize toremifene in all indications
which we have licensed from Orion Corporation, or Orion, which include all
indications in humans except the treatment and prevention of breast cancer
outside of the United States. We currently market FARESTON® (toremifene citrate)
60 mg tablets, approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in
postmenopausal women in the United States.
In December 2007, we and Merck & Co., Inc., or Merck, entered into a
collaboration to discover and develop selective androgen receptor modulators, or
SARMs, a new class of drugs with the potential to treat sarcopenia, which is the
loss of skeletal muscle mass resulting in reduced physical strength and ability
to perform activities of daily living, cancer cachexia (cancer induced muscle
loss), and other musculoskeletal wasting or muscle loss conditions. We and Merck
are conducting several Phase I and Phase II clinical trials evaluating multiple
SARM product candidates including Ostarine™ (also designated by Merck as
MK-2866) for sarcopenia. In October 2008, we announced topline results of a
Phase II clinical trial evaluating Ostarine™ in patients with cancer cachexia.
In this analysis, the study met its primary endpoint of absolute change in total
lean body mass (muscle) compared to placebo and the secondary endpoint of muscle
function (performance) after 16 weeks of treatment. In addition to cancer
cachexia and sarcopenia, we and Merck are evaluating additional muscle loss
indications for potential SARM clinical development.
We also have an extensive preclinical pipeline generated from our own
discovery program, including GTx-758, an oral luteinizing hormone, or LH,
inhibitor being developed for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, and
GTx-878, an estrogen receptor beta agonist, a new class of drugs being developed
for
the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH. Since we are planning for
the commercialization of our toremifene product candidates, we only plan to
initiate Phase I clinical testing for GTx-758 in 2009.
Our most advanced product candidate, toremifene, is being developed for the
prevention of fractures and treatment of other estrogen deficiency side effects
of ADT for prostate cancer and to prevent prostate cancer in high risk men with
high grade PIN. ADT, by gonadotropin releasing hormone therapy or surgical
castration, is the primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer, and we
believe it is currently used to treat approximately 700,000 men in the United
States. In men, aromatase converts testosterone to estrogen. By reducing
testosterone to castrate levels, ADT depletes up to 80% of a man's estrogen,
resulting in multiple estrogen deficiency side effects. These side effects
include increased risk of serious fractures, which can reduce survival in men on
ADT by more than 3 years, as well as accelerated and continuous bone loss. Other
estrogen deficiency side effects include adverse lipid changes and increased
risk of cardiovascular disease, as well as common symptomatic side effects, such
as hot flashes and gynecomastia (painful breast enlargement). There are
currently no drugs approved by the FDA for the treatment of the estrogen
deficiency side effects of ADT. We commenced a pivotal Phase III clinical trial
of toremifene 80 mg under a Special Protocol Assessment, or SPA, with the FDA
for this indication in November 2003. A SPA is designed to facilitate the FDA's
review and approval of drug products by allowing the agency to evaluate the
proposed design and size of clinical trials that are intended to form the
primary basis for determining a drug product's efficacy. The primary endpoint
was new morphometric vertebral fractures measured by x-ray, and the secondary
endpoints included BMD, lipid profile changes, gynecomastia and hot flashes. In
the first quarter of 2008, we announced that the results of the Phase III
clinical trial showed that toremifene 80 mg reduced new morphometric vertebral
fractures, met other key endpoints of BMD, lipid profiles and gynecomastia and
also demonstrated a reduction in hot flashes in a subset of patients. We plan to
submit a NDA for toremifene 80 mg in the fourth quarter of this year. We cannot
predict if the NDA will be approved in a timely manner, or at all, and if
approved, if the FDA will require any restrictions, limitations, and/or warnings
in the label.
In January 2005, we initiated a pivotal Phase III clinical trial of
toremifene 20 mg for the prevention of prostate cancer in high risk men with
high grade PIN, which is being conducted under a SPA with the FDA. A planned
efficacy interim analysis was conducted in the second quarter of 2008 which did
not reach the specified statistical outcome of p<0.003 required under the SPA.
We anticipate conducting a second planned efficacy analysis after a certain
number of additional cancer events have been recorded among study patients,
which we currently expect to occur in the summer of 2009. If the efficacy
analysis achieves a prespecified statistical goal, we plan to submit a NDA to
the FDA. If we are able to submit a NDA based on the results of the planned
efficacy analysis, we will continue the study to collect efficacy data and
safety data during the NDA review process to satisfy the FDA's safety
requirements set forth in the SPA. If the results from the efficacy analysis do
not satisfy the specified statistical requirements, we will make a final
determination about the continuation of the toremifene 20 mg Phase III clinical
trial. In July 2008, an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board conducted a
planned, semi-annual review of unblinded safety data from the approximately
1,590 patients participating in the toremifene 20 mg Phase III high grade PIN
clinical trial and recommended the clinical trial continue as planned.
In our third clinical program, OstarineTM, a SARM, is being developed to
treat sarcopenia, cancer cachexia, and other musculoskeletal wasting or muscle
loss conditions. In December 2006, we announced that OstarineTM met its primary
endpoint in a Phase II proof of concept, double blind, randomized, placebo
controlled clinical trial in 60 elderly men and 60 postmenopausal women. In
October 2008, we announced topline results of a Phase II clinical trial
evaluating Ostarine™ in patients with cancer cachexia. In this analysis, the
study met its primary endpoint of absolute change in total lean body mass
(muscle) compared to placebo and the secondary endpoint of muscle function
(performance) after 16 weeks of treatment in 159 cancer patients with reported
weight loss. We and Merck, through our
SARM collaboration, will determine the continued development strategy of
Ostarine™ and other SARM collaboration compounds.
In December 2007, we entered into a license and collaboration agreement with
Merck which governs our and Merck's joint research, development and
commercialization of SARM compounds and related SARM products, including SARMs
currently being developed by us and Merck and those yet to be discovered, for
all potential indications of interest. Under the agreement, we are conducting
preclinical research of SARM compounds and products, and Merck is primarily
responsible for conducting and funding development and commercialization of
products developed. We received an upfront licensing fee of $40.0 million in
January 2008, of which $1.9 million was paid to the University of Tennessee
Research Foundation, or UTRF, as sublicense royalty. Merck also agreed to pay us
$15.0 million in guaranteed cost reimbursements for research and development
activities in equal annual installments over a three year period beginning on
the first anniversary of the effective date of the agreement. We are also
eligible to receive up to $422.0 million in future milestone payments associated
with the development and regulatory approval of a lead product candidate,
including Ostarine™, as defined in the agreement, if multiple indications are
developed and receive required regulatory approvals, as well as additional
milestone payments for the development and regulatory approval of other product
candidates developed under the agreement, upon the achievement of such
development and regulatory approval milestones and assuming the continued
effectiveness of the agreement. Merck also has agreed to pay us tiered royalties
on net sales of products that may be developed under the agreement. On the date
the license and collaboration agreement with Merck became effective in
December 2007, we issued to Merck 1,285,347 newly-issued shares of our common
stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $30.0 million.
Our net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $37.9 million.
Our net loss included FARESTON® net product sales of $846,000 and the
recognition of collaboration revenue of $9.7 million. We have financed our
operations and internal growth primarily through public offerings and private
placements of our common stock and preferred stock, as well as proceeds from our
collaborations. We expect to continue to incur net losses as we continue our
clinical development and research and development activities, apply for
regulatory approvals, expand our sales and marketing capabilities and grow our
operations.
• the continuation of the pivotal Phase III clinical trial of toremifene 20 mg for the prevention of prostate cancer in high risk men with high grade PIN;
• our ongoing SARM research efforts with Merck as a part of our collaboration;
• the continued preclinical and clinical development of other product candidates, including GTx-758; and
• increases in research and development personnel.
There is a risk that any drug discovery and development program may not
produce revenue. Moreover, because of uncertainties inherent in drug discovery
and development, including those factors described in Part II, Item 1A, "Risk
Factors" of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we may not be able to
successfully develop and commercialize any of our product candidates.
Product
Candidate/ Development
Program Proposed Indication Phase Status
Clinical
SERM Toremifene
80 mg
Estrogen deficiency side Pivotal Phase Phase III clinical
effects of ADT for III trial, which was
prostate cancer clinical trial conducted under a
SPA, completed in
February 2008;
achieved primary
endpoint of
reduction of new
morphometric
vertebral fractures;
NDA planned to be
submitted in the
fourth quarter of
2008
Toremifene
20 mg
Prevention of prostate Pivotal Phase Phase III clinical
cancer in high risk men III trial ongoing under
with high grade PIN clinical trial a SPA; planned
efficacy analysis
expected to occur in
the summer of 2009
SARM OstarineTM
Cancer cachexia Phase II Phase II proof of
clinical trial concept clinical
trial completed in
December 2006;
results of a Phase
II clinical trial to
treat cancer
cachexia announced
in October 2008
Preclinical
LH inhibitor GTx-758
Advanced prostate Preclinical Phase I clinical
cancer testing planned to
initiate in 2009
Estrogen receptor GTx-878
beta agonist BPH Preclinical Preclinical
|
Revenue Recognition
Our revenues consist of product sales of FARESTON® and revenues derived from
our collaboration and license agreements.
We use revenue recognition criteria outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin
("SAB") No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements as amended by SAB
No. 104, (together, "SAB 104"), Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 48, Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists ("SFAS
No. 48"), Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 00-21, Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables ("EITF 00-21") and EITF Issue No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal Versus Net as an Agent ("EITF 99-19").
Accordingly, revenues from licensing agreements are recognized based on the
performance requirements of the agreement. We have analyzed our agreements with
multiple element arrangements to determine whether the deliverables under the
agreement, including license and performance obligations such as joint steering
committee participation and research and development activities, can be
separated or whether all of the deliverables must be accounted for as a single
unit of accounting in accordance with EITF 00-21. For these arrangements, we
were not able to identify evidence of fair value for the undelivered elements
and therefore recognize any consideration for a single unit of accounting in the
same manner as the revenue is recognized for the final deliverable, which is
ratable over the performance period. The performance period is estimated at the
inception of the agreement and is reevaluated at each reporting period. Cost
reimbursements for research activities are recognized as collaboration revenue
if the provisions of EITF 99-19 are met, the amounts are determinable and
collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Revenues from
milestone payments for which we have no continuing performance obligations are
recognized upon achievement of the performance milestone, as defined in the
related agreement, provided the milestone is substantive and a culmination of
the earnings process has occurred. Performance obligations typically consist of
significant milestones in the development life cycle of the related product
candidates and technology, such as initiation of clinical trials, achievement of
specified clinical trial endpoints, filing for approval with regulatory agencies
and approvals by regulatory agencies.
We estimate the performance obligation period to be ten years for our
collaboration agreement with Merck and five years for the development of
toremifene for both the high grade PIN and ADT indications in the European
Territory under our collaboration agreement with Ipsen. The factors that drive
the actual development period of a pharmaceutical product are inherently
uncertain and include determining the timing and expected costs to complete the
project, projecting regulatory approvals and anticipating potential delays. We
use all of these factors in initially estimating the economic useful lives of
our performance obligations, and we also continually monitor these factors for
indications of appropriate revisions.
We recognize net product sales revenue from sales of FARESTON® less
deductions for estimated sales discounts and sales returns. We recognize revenue
from product sales when the goods are shipped and title and risk of loss pass to
the customer and the other criteria of SAB No. 104 and SFAS No. 48 are
satisfied. We account for rebates to certain governmental agencies as a
reduction of product sales. We allow customers to return product within a
specified time period prior to and subsequent to the product's labeled
expiration date. As a result, we estimate an accrual for product returns, which
is recorded as a reduction of product sales, based on factors which include
historical product returns and estimated product in the distribution channel
which is expected to exceed its expiration date. We retained substantially the
same wholesale customers of, and the distribution channel that was used by,
another pharmaceutical company that distributed FARESTON® for six years prior to
our obtaining the rights to market FARESTON®in January 2005. We also obtained
historical product return trend information that we continue to update with our
own product return data. We estimate the amount of product in the distribution
. . .
|
|