|
Quotes & Info
|
| AFFM > SEC Filings for AFFM > Form 10-Q on 8-Aug-2008 | All Recent SEC Filings |
8-Aug-2008
Quarterly Report
OVERVIEW
We are a distributor and producer of non-standard personal automobile insurance policies and related products and services for individual consumers in targeted geographic markets. Non-standard personal automobile insurance policies provide coverage to drivers who find it difficult to obtain insurance from standard automobile insurance companies due to their lack of prior insurance, age, driving record, limited financial resources or other factors. Non-standard personal automobile insurance policies generally require higher premiums than standard automobile insurance policies for comparable coverage.
As of June 30, 2008, our subsidiaries included five insurance companies licensed to write insurance policies in 40 states, four underwriting agencies, and six retail agencies with 223 owned stores and 34 operating franchise retail store locations and relationships with two unaffiliated underwriting agencies. We are currently active in offering insurance directly to individual consumers through retail stores in 10 states (Louisiana, Texas, Illinois, Alabama, Florida, Missouri, Indiana, South Carolina, Kansas, and Wisconsin), including our franchised stores in Florida, and distributing our own insurance policies through 8,100 independent agents in 9 states (Texas, Illinois, California, Michigan, Florida, Missouri, Indiana, South Carolina, and New Mexico). The 13 states in which we operate collectively represent approximately 56% of the non-standard personal automobile insurance market. These states accounted for $16.7 billion in direct written premium in 2006, based on information from A. M. Best and our company analysis. We believe the states in which we operate are among the most attractive non-standard personal automobile insurance markets due to a number of factors, including size of market and existing regulatory and competitive environments.
We believe that the delivery of non-standard personal automobile insurance policies to individual consumers requires the interaction of three basic operations, each with a specialized function:
• Insurance companies, which possess the regulatory authority and capital necessary to issue insurance policies;
• Underwriting agencies, which supply centralized infrastructure and personnel required to design and service insurance policies that are distributed through retail agencies; and
• Retail agencies, which provide multiple points of sale under established local brands with personnel licensed and trained to sell insurance policies and ancillary products to individual consumers.
Our three operating components often function as a vertically integrated unit, capturing the premium and associated risk and commission income and fees generated from the sale of an insurance policy. There are other instances, however, when each of our operations functions with unaffiliated entities on an unbundled basis, either independently or with one or both of the other two operations.
We believe that our ability to enter into a variety of business relationships with third-parties allows us to maximize sales penetration and profitability through industry cycles better than if we employed a single, vertically integrated operating structure.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no changes of critical accounting policies since December 31, 2007.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, which requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full fair value. SFAS No. 141R also requires, among other things, the acquisition costs to be expensed in the periods they are incurred, the contingent considerations resulting from events after the acquisition date to be measured and recognized at the acquisition date fair value with subsequent changes recognized in earnings, and the change in deferred tax benefit that are recognizable because of a business combination to be recognized either in income or directly in contributed capital in the period of business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective for business combinations occurring after December 15, 2008. If we have business combinations, SFAS No. 141R could have a material impact in the future on our results of operations or financial condition.
MEASUREMENT OF PERFORMANCE
We are an insurance holding company engaged in the underwriting, servicing and distributing of non-standard personal automobile insurance policies and related products and services. We distribute our products through three distinct distribution channels: our owned retail stores, independent agents and unaffiliated managing general agencies. We generate earned premiums and fees from policyholders through the sale of our insurance products. In addition, through our owned retail stores, we sell insurance policies of third-party insurers and other products or services of unaffiliated third-party providers and thereby earn commission income from those third-party providers and insurers and fees from the customers.
As part of our corporate strategy, we treat our owned retail stores as independent agents, encouraging them to sell to their individual customers whatever products are most appropriate for and affordable to those customers. We believe that this offers our retail customers the best combination of service and value, developing stronger customer loyalty and improving customer retention. In practice, this means that in our owned retail stores, the relative proportion of the sales of our own insurance products as compared to the sales of the third-party policies will vary depending upon the competitiveness of our insurance products in the marketplace during the period. This reflects our intention of maintaining the margins in our insurance company subsidiaries, even at the cost of business lost to third-party carriers.
The market conditions that existed for the past several years continued in the first half of 2008 putting downward pressure on industry rate levels. Our insurance company subsidiaries have continued developing and introducing new and better segmented products to serve our target markets.
In the independent agency distribution channel and the unaffiliated managing general agency (MGA) distribution channel, the effect of competitive conditions is the same as in our owned retail store distribution channel. As in our retail stores, independent agents (either working directly with us or through unaffiliated MGAs) not only offer our products but also offer their customers a selection of products by third-party carriers. Therefore, our insurance products must be competitive in pricing, features, commission rates and ease of sale or the independent agents will sell the products of those third-parties instead of our products. We believe that we are generally competitive in the markets we serve, and we constantly evaluate our products relative to those of other carriers.
Premiums. One measurement of our performance is the level of gross premiums written and a second measurement is the relative proportion of premiums written through our three distribution channels. The following table displays our gross premiums written and assumed by distribution channel for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2008 2007 2008 2007
Our underwriting agencies:
Retail agencies $ 54,523 $ 55,852 $ 127,238 $ 135,669
Independent agencies 29,520 36,976 66,274 88,922
Subtotal 84,043 92,828 193,512 224,591
Unaffiliated underwriting agencies 7,185 9,324 16,878 20,716
Other - 1 (1 ) (1 )
Total $ 91,228 $ 102,153 $ 210,389 $ 245,306
|
In our independent agency distribution channel, gross premiums written for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $7.5 million and $22.6 million, respectively, or 20.2% and 25.5%, compared with the prior year. The decrease is due to the overall decline in premium volumes.
Gross premiums written by our unaffiliated agencies for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $2.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively or 22.9% and 18.5%, compared with the prior year. For strategic reasons, we have chosen to reduce our emphasis on growth in the unaffiliated underwriting agencies distribution channel.
The following table displays our gross premiums written and assumed, by state, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2008 2007 Change 2008 2007 Change
Louisiana $ 32,070 $ 33,165 $ (1,095 ) $ 73,809 $ 77,450 $ (3,641 )
Texas 16,080 16,867 (787 ) 35,209 38,744 (3,535 )
Illinois 12,093 15,791 (3,698 ) 29,531 37,846 (8,315 )
California 7,066 8,975 (1,909 ) 16,597 19,821 (3,224 )
Alabama 5,999 4,785 1,214 14,987 11,570 3,417
Florida 7,216 7,810 (594 ) 11,474 16,731 (5,257 )
Michigan 3,076 4,164 (1,088 ) 9,325 13,594 (4,269 )
Missouri 2,066 2,859 (793 ) 6,134 9,548 (3,414 )
Indiana 2,244 3,006 (762 ) 5,559 8,179 (2,620 )
South Carolina 2,346 3,453 (1,107 ) 5,497 8,070 (2,573 )
New Mexico 853 927 (74 ) 1,987 2,858 (871 )
Arizona 61 229 (168 ) 158 552 (394 )
Georgia 59 96 (37 ) 123 213 (90 )
Utah - 24 (24 ) - 130 (130 )
Other (1 ) 2 (3 ) (1 ) - (1 )
Total $ 91,228 $ 102,153 $ (10,925 ) $ 210,389 $ 245,306 $ (34,917 )
|
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2008 2007 2008 2007
Our underwriting agencies:
Retail agencies - gross premiums written $ 54,523 $ 55,852 $ 127,238 $ 135,669
Ceded reinsurance (9,521 ) 28,277 (22,175 ) (10,813 )
Subtotal retail agencies net premiums written 45,002 84,129 105,063 124,856
Independent agencies - gross premiums written 29,520 36,976 66,274 88,922
Ceded reinsurance (392 ) (617 ) (1,139 ) (2,451 )
Subtotal independent agencies net premiums
written 29,128 36,359 65,135 86,471
Unaffiliated underwriting agencies - gross
premiums written 7,185 9,324 16,878 20,716
Ceded reinsurance (59 ) (96 ) (123 ) (213 )
Subtotal unaffiliated underwriting agencies
net premiums written 7,126 9,228 16,755 20,503
Catastrophe and contingent coverages with
various reinsurers (150 ) - (420 ) -
Other, net (28 ) 1 (59 ) (1 )
Total net premiums written $ 81,078 $ 129,717 $ 186,474 $ 231,829
|
Total net premiums written for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $48.6 million, or 37.5%, compared with the prior year quarter. Total net premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $45.3 million, or 19.6%, compared with the prior year period. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, net premiums written in our retail distribution channel decreased $39.1 million, or 46.5%, compared with the same period in the prior year. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net premiums written in our retail distribution channel decreased $19.8 million, or 15.9%, compared with the same period in the prior year. The decrease in both periods was primarily due to our exercise of an option to terminate certain reinsurance contracts on a "cut-off" basis on April 1, 2007. As a result, we received $31.0 million to settle the unearned premiums less ceding commissions. In addition on April 1, 2007 our retention increased from 30% to 75% in Louisiana and from 25% to 75% in Alabama on policies issued in those two states.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth the components of consolidated statements of
income as a percentage of total revenues and certain operational information for
the periods indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2008 2007 2008 2007
Revenues
Net premiums earned 79.9 % 80.5 % 79.2 % 78.1 %
Commission income and fees 17.1 16.8 17.4 18.9
Net investment income 2.9 2.9 3.3 3.2
Net realized gains (losses) 0.1 (0.2 ) 0.1 (0.2 )
Total revenues 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Expenses
Losses and loss adjustment expenses 60.0 58.9 59.5 57.4
Selling, general and administrative expenses 31.7 33.6 30.5 33.1
Depreciation and amortization 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.4
Interest expense 3.7 4.5 4.1 5.2
Total expenses 97.5 99.0 96.1 98.1
Income before income taxes 2.5 1.0 3.9 1.9
Income taxes 0.5 0.2 1.0 0.6
Net income 2.0 % 0.8 % 2.9 % 1.3 %
Operational Information
Gross premiums written $ 91,228 $ 102,153 $ 210,389 $ 245,306
Net premiums written 81,078 129,717 186,474 231,829
Percentage retained 88.9 % 127.0 % 88.6 % 94.5 %
Loss ratio 75.1 % 73.1 % 75.2 % 73.5 %
Expense ratio 20.9 23.4 18.9 21.3
Combined ratio 96.0 % 96.5 % 94.1 % 94.8 %
Effective tax rate 21.0 % 17.5 % 25.1 % 30.0 %
|
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $23.6 million, or 16.8%, compared with the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in net earned premium, commission income and fees and investment income.
The largest component of revenue is net premiums earned on insurance policies issued by our five affiliated insurance carriers. Net premiums earned for the current quarter decreased $19.7 million, or 17.4%, compared with the prior year quarter. Since insurance premiums are earned over the service period of the policies, the revenue in the current quarter includes premiums earned on insurance products written through our three distribution channels in both current and previous periods. Net premiums earned during the current quarter on policies sold through our affiliated underwriting agencies (including retail and independent agencies) decreased by $17.9 million, or 17.4%. This decrease was primarily due to lower revenue related to sales of our insurance products due to the decline in production and the macroeconomic effects including higher fuel and food prices and the deterioration of the labor market and the ongoing competitive impact that has created a "soft" market. Net premiums earned on insurance products sold through the unaffiliated underwriting agencies distribution channel decreased by $1.8 million, or 18.0%, compared with the prior year quarter. For strategic reasons, we have chosen to reduce our emphasis on the unaffiliated underwriting agencies distribution channel.
Three Months Ended June 30,
2008 2007 $ Change % Change
Our underwriting agencies $ 85,149 $ 103,045 $ (17,896 ) (17.4 )%
Unaffiliated underwriting agencies 8,374 10,212 (1,838 ) (18.0 )
Total net premiums earned $ 93,523 $ 113,257 $ (19,734 ) (17.4 )%
|
Commission Income and Fees. Another measurement of our performance is the relative level of production of commission income and fees. Commission income and fees consists of three principal types, including (a) the commission income and fees earned by our underwriting agencies on insurance business that is not written or retained by us, (b) policy, installment, premium finance, franchise, royalty and agency fees earned for business written or assumed by our insurance companies both through independent agents and our retail agencies and (c) the commission income earned on sales of unaffiliated (third-party) companies' insurance polices or other products sold by our retail agencies. These various types of commission income and fees are impacted in different ways by the decisions we make in pursuing our corporate strategy.
Commission income and fees are earned by our underwriting agencies on business that is not written or retained by us. We only earn this income when we reinsure a portion of our insurance business to other parties. We have substantially eliminated our reinsurance contracts with our underwriting agencies and, as a result, this income source has been almost eliminated. Instead, we generate additional premium on the retained business, increasing our earned premiums. Had we continued to utilize reinsurance to a greater extent, our earned premiums would have been reduced but we would have earned greater commission income and fees for servicing the policies. In the future, we may choose to increase the use of reinsurance, which could result in an increase in this type of commission income and fees, and a concomitant reduction in earned premiums.
Policy, installment, premium finance, franchise, royalty and agency fees are earned for business written or assumed by our insurance companies both through independent agents and our retail agencies. Policy, installment and agency fees are fees charged to the customers in connection with their purchase of coverage from our insurance carriers. We can increase or decrease agency and installment fees at will, but policy fees and interest rates must be approved by the applicable state's department of insurance. Premium finance fees are financing fees earned by our premium finance subsidiaries, and consist of interest and origination fees on policies that customers choose to finance. Franchise and royalty fees are earned from our franchised stores in Florida, but are not significant to our financial results.
Commissions are earned on sales of unaffiliated (third-party) companies' products sold by our retail agencies. As described above, in our owned retail stores there can be a shift in the relative proportion of the sales of third-party insurance products as compared to sales of our own carriers' products due to the relative competitiveness of our insurance products that could result in an increase in our commission income and fees from non-affiliated third-party insurers. We negotiate commission rates with the various third-party carriers whose products we agree to sell in our retail stores. As a result, the level of third-party commission income will also vary depending upon the mix by carrier of third-party products that are sold. In addition, we earn fees from the sales of other products and services (such as tax preparation services, auto club memberships and bond cards) offered by unaffiliated companies.
Three Months Ended
June 30,
2008 2007 $ Change % Change
Income on non-retained business:
MGA commissions $ 45 $ 172 $ (127 ) (73.8 )%
Claims service fee income 127 379 (252 ) (66.5 )
Income related to sales of our insurance products:
Policyholder fee income 11,262 13,102 (1,840 ) (14.0 )
Premium finance revenue 4,987 5,897 (910 ) (15.4 )
Agency fees 136 383 (247 ) (64.5 )
Income related to sales of third-party products:
Commissions and fees 2,451 3,086 (635 ) (20.6 )
Agency fees 1,016 571 445 77.9
Total commission income and fees $ 20,024 $ 23,590 $ (3,566 ) (15.1 )%
|
Commission income and fees decreased $3.6 million, or 15.1%, compared with the prior year quarter. This decrease was primarily due to lower fees and premium finance revenue related to sales of our insurance products due to the decline in production.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income for the current quarter decreased $0.7 million, or 17.2%, compared with the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily due to a lower invested balance partially offset by an increase in yield.
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses. Since the largest expenses of an insurance company are the losses and loss adjustment expenses, another measurement of our insurance carriers' performance is the level of such expenses, specifically as a ratio to earned premiums. Our losses and loss adjustment expenses are a blend of the specific estimated and actual costs of providing the coverage contracted by the purchasers of our insurance policies. We maintain reserves to cover our estimated ultimate liability for losses and related loss adjustment expenses for both reported and unreported claims on the insurance policies issued by our insurance companies. The establishment of appropriate reserves is an inherently uncertain process, involving actuarial and statistical projections of what we expect to be the cost of the ultimate settlement and administration of claims based on historical claims information, estimates of future trends in claims severity and other variable factors such as inflation. Due to the inherent uncertainty of estimating reserves, reserve estimates can be expected to vary from period to period. To the extent that our reserves prove to be inadequate in the future, we would be required to increase our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses and incur a charge to earnings in the period during which such reserves are increased. We have a limited history in establishing reserves and the historic development of our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses is not necessarily indicative of future trends in the development of these amounts.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the current quarter decreased $12.6 . . .
|
|